New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Perspectives given on Munchausen Syndrome
by proxy

(May 2007 Issue)

By Nan Shnitzler

Munchausen Syndrome by proxy is a baffling and elusive disorder. Like Munchausen Syndrome, named for an 18th century German dignitary who wildly embellished his exploits as a soldier and sportsman, it involves fabricating illness to attract attention. Unlike Munchausen's, it can be a form of child abuse in which a primary caretaker, typically a mother, deliberately falsifies, exaggerates or induces medical or psychological symptoms in a child and lies about it.

"There is a subgroup of adults who harm other adults in their care. That's Munchausen by proxy as well," says Catherine Ayoub, R.N., M.N., Ed.D., "but the classical picture is a mother harming a child."

The diagnosis has been controversial. DSM-IV encompasses Munchausen Syndrome under "factitious disorders." Several conditions for "factitious disorder by proxy" are listed in Appendix B for further study.

A multidisciplinary task force hopes their work will clarify the diagnosis, according to Ayoub, of Harvard University, who chaired the group under the auspices of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children (APSAC). The task force reviewed the literature and came up with working definitions, published in 2002, to help clinicians and courts better identify Munchausen Syndrome in victims and families and to establish a mandate for appropriate services.

They realized the disorder had two inextricable components: a child victim of "pediatric condition falsification" caused by an adult perpetrator with "factitious disorder by proxy (FDP)." The perpetrator acts from deep-seated psychological needs for attention or assimilation. The task force claims Munchausen by proxy is under diagnosed because the falsification is covert and the perpetrators are remarkably convincing.

But identical behavior absent the guiding motivation is not considered FDP, for example, if symptom falsification is motivated by the desire to discredit a spouse in a custody battle.

For that and other reasons, Eric Mart, Ph.D., ABPP, a forensic psychologist licensed in New Hampshire and Massachusetts and author of "Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy Reconsidered" has called for abandoning the Munchausen by proxy diagnosis in favor of specific, detailed descriptions of how the parent is alleged to have harmed the child, as is done in most child abuse cases. He thinks the dynamics of Munchausen by proxy are too broad to be bottled into diagnostic categories, not that the offending behavior doesn't exist.

"Don't misunderstand, there's no question that some parents abuse their children using medicine and the medical system," Mart says. "When I express doubts, it's not that people do this, but that the formulation of the syndrome is the problem."

Mart says that the accumulated Munchausen by proxy literature is mostly recursive and that scant empirical research has been performed. He thinks competing definitions of Munchausen by proxy hamper scientific studies.

"If you apply three or four different definitions, you can't research it well because everybody is researching something different," Mart says.

Prior to being director of clinic services for the Massachusetts juvenile court, Patricia Cone, Ph.D., J.D. was a staff forensic psychologist at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. She agrees the science has room for advancement, but won't ignore the DSM diagnosis just because it appears in the appendix.

"As with any provisional diagnosis, we have to move carefully and not jump to conclusions about the presence or absence of signs, and try not to view the world through one particular lens," Cone says.

Absent the smoking gun of catching a parent red-handed or clear video evidence of tampering, the next best telltale for Munchausen by proxy is a child who gets dramatically better when the parent is away. Coupled with medical evidence that makes no sense, Cone says, at that point she would start to think about the possibility of Munchausen by proxy. Separating the child from the parent, while not to be done lightly, would be a "natural experiment."

"If you think the parent is the agent of harm, you remove the parent and the harm goes away, I find that to be powerful information," Cone says.

Psychiatrist Thrassos Calligas, M.D. of the McLean ward at Boston's Franciscan Hospital for Children says he assumes the parents are acting in good faith.

"Munchausen by proxy is not the first thing that comes to mind. It's a rare condition," Calligas says.

But if clinicians perceive inappropriate affect in a parent, for example, hiding a smile over a flare up of symptoms, insisting on invasive tests or getting oddly excited over a new batch of diagnostic results, they will tend to pay more attention to the medical inconsistencies, Calligas says.

"The issue is this is really child abuse based on severe personality psychopathology in a parent," Calligas says. "Treatment has to involve external controls like DSS and the court system in order to manage the case. It's not something that can be contained within the clinician's office."

Ayoub points to her long-term study of 50 legally-ruled Munchausen syndrome by proxy families in which two completed a 10-year treatment process. The key to success was an integrated treatment team of every provider that touched the family: individual therapists, family therapists, pediatricians, court representatives, DSS, school personnel. The team met monthly to share information; confidentiality was held in the group.

"What these mothers do is divide and conquer," Ayoub says. "That's why the team approach is so important."

And that's Ayoub's message to psychologists. If the case knowledgebase is fragmented among providers, they won't know the perpetrator is lying, thus providing an opportunity to feed the pathology as she manipulates the players. It might take hundreds of hours, but the case information must be integrated, Ayoub says.

"Even if you've been practicing for 25 or 30 years, you can't do quick and dirty evaluations from a mental health perspective," Ayoub says. "Providers coming back to say, 'This mom was just fine. She was willing to do anything we want,' are doing a disservice."