New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Company plans genetic test to predict schizophrenia
(October 2006 Issue)

By Ami Albernaz

If a test could reveal your chances for developing schizophrenia, would you take it? The question might become more than hypothetical as a Kentucky company is planning to have a genetic test for schizophrenia available in two years.

The company, SureGene, a spin-off of a laboratory at the University of Louisville, is basing its test on two genetic variations that are evident in some schizophrenia patients. When shared by a patient and a sibling, each variation signifies a heightened risk of developing the illness.

Tim Ramsey, co-founder of SureGene, says the test could be taken by adults who have passed the typical age of onset and are considering having children. "It might be useful information to have, if they have a family history of schizophrenia," he says. "They at least would have the information to make an informed choice."

He imagines the test also being useful for young relatives of someone with schizophrenia. "There's an emphasis right now on delaying onset," Ramsey says. "How that's going to shake out, we don't know. But if families know the risk - if they know a child is at risk - they can see a mental health professional and improve the outcome."

Psychologists and psychiatrists who work with schizophrenia patients expressed skepticism about such a test, while acknowledging that awareness of risk could have both benefits and drawbacks.

"The problem is that schizophrenia is caused by multiple genes - maybe as many as 50 - each with a very weak effect. We don't know yet what those genes are or the relationship and interactions between them and the environment," says Godfrey Pearlson, M.D., director of the Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center at the Institute of Living, part of Hartford Hospital in Connecticut.

He adds: "I'm amazingly skeptical of any test that purports to give genetic risk of schizophrenia. All it could give you is a flavor of risk based on the genetic factors known thus far."

Kim Mueser, Ph.D., a professor in the psychiatry and community and family medicine departments at Dartmouth Medical School in Hanover, N.H., says that unless the new test is highly accurate in revealing a person's risk for schizophrenia, its results could be unhelpful in a genetic counseling situation or for planning behavioral or drug interventions during the prodromal period.

"Even the most vulnerable people [in terms of family history] don't develop schizophrenia very often," Mueser says. If the results of the test were not accurate, administering preventative treatment "would very quickly become costly."

A reliable test, however, "would be tremendously useful for treatment providers," he adds.

Pearlson, meanwhile, believes it is simply too early for knowledge of schizophrenia risk to be of clear benefit. He gives the example of Huntington's disease, which is fatal and for which there is no treatment. If someone possesses a single genetic mutation, his chance of developing the condition is 100 percent. "It doesn't help to know that you have that genetic mutation," he says.

In the case of schizophrenia, whether or not pre-onset treatment is helpful is up for debate, he says. Not smoking cannabis and not taking hallucinogens are among the recommendations for people seen to be at risk, but there is nothing specific.

Pearlson is not without optimism, though, for the benefits that will arise from genetic testing down the road. "The wave of the future is finding genetic tests that will give the likelihood of developing a particular disorder: breast cancer, colon polyps or Alzheimer's disease, for instance," he says. "The approach will eventually pay off."