New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

Psychologists may play role in research
(April 2006 Issue)

By Phyllis Hanlon

In May 2005, the Connecticut legislature earmarked $100 million for embryonic stem cell research, the funds to be dispersed in equal amounts over 10 years. Wesleyan and Yale University, as well as the University of Connecticut, are currently preparing proposals outlining research initiatives and hope to secure a portion of the funding. But how does this news affect psychologists?

Stem cell research depends on a number of controversial and risky processes including derivation through in vitro fertilization and/or egg donation, storage, distribution and eventual therapeutic use of embryonic stem cell lines.

To achieve consistency throughout the investigative process, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued guidelines last year for institutions that intend to conduct embryonic stem cell research. An embryonic stem cell research oversight committee (ESCRO) charged with developing guidelines for evaluating the ethical aspects of stem cell research, must be assembled. The committee is also responsible for performing educational activities for all segments of the population.

According to Anne L. Hiskes, Ph.D., ESCRO chair and director of Research, Ethics and Education for Stem Cell Research at UConn's Storrs campus, psychologists will be particularly interested in the many ethical questions that concern everyone, from scientists to the general public to those who hope to benefit from the research findings. "We have to understand and be sensitive to the issues," says Hiskes.

Hiskes points out that although this research holds some as yet unproven promise, she cites the need for caution and views the research process as a carefully orchestrated ethical exercise. She says, "You have to balance respect for the embryo against the political environment."

According to Hiskes, several aspects throughout the process carry psychological implications and may require professional attention and intervention. She reports that embryonic donation poses ethical questions for donors who have harvested an excess number of embryos or who no longer want or need them. "What kind of counseling/advisement takes place?" she asks.

Additionally, women who donate eggs must undergo a physically strenuous as well as an emotionally draining process. "You have to hyperstimulate the ovaries to get multiple eggs. There are inherent risks," says Hiskes. Even hormone injections prior to egg donation produce negative psychological effects, she states. Although women are carefully screened prior to egg donation, internal anxiety as well as pressure from family and friends may cause emotional turmoil.

Lori Gruen, Ph.D., associate professor of philosophy, co-chair of women's studies and chair of the ESCRO Committee at Wesleyan University, points out that in addition to the above-mentioned issues, informed consent presents another psychological concern. "The process of getting the necessary materials to engage in embryonic stem cell research involves assistive reproductive technology. Getting informed consent from women at this stage raises interesting psychological questions," she says. "Psychologists may want to become involved in the emotional aspects of this."

Gruen adds that expectations for stem cell research run high in both the scientific and lay communities. "Embryonic stem cell research is seen as pluripotent and self-regenerating, that is, [the cells] have the potential to develop into any part of the human body," she says. "People with Parkinson's disease, spinal cord injuries, diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases could benefit."

However, the excitement must be managed. "You have to weigh the costs, risks and benefits. Psychologists could be useful in helping think through these complicated issues," Gruen says. "For those with psychological trauma from spinal cord and neurodegenerative diseases and other medical issues, psychologists could help patients decide whether to take risks or not." Gruen says, "It's important for all thoughtful professionals to think about the implications."