New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

R.I. psychologists unhappy with
UnitedHealthcare contract
(July 2005 Issue)

By Elinor Nelson

Rhode Island psychologists still claim to have not received official notices from UnitedHealthcare regarding the nuts and bolts of the state's transition from Blue Cross/Blue Shield of R.I. to United for health care services to state workers, retirees and their families. And UnitedHealthcare claims to have furnished all of the information a psychologist could reasonably expect to get from an insurance company making the transition. Unfortunately, it looks like business as usual between R.I.'s psychologists and United.

The problem stems from UnitedHealthcare winning the new contract, which was implemented on May 1, 2005. United's mental health reimbursement rates had been substantially less than Blue Cross Blue Shield's and although the company raised its rates in March, the payments still fall short of the resource-based relative value scale offered by Medicare. The Medicare rates are viewed as minimum wage for practitioners, according to Peter Oppenheimer, Ph.D., legislative/managed care liaison for the R.I. Psychological Association (RIPA).

Providence psychologist Robert Pressman, Ph.D., who has written several books on practice management, has compiled data showing that United pays from $17 to $55 less per patient than Blue Cross Blue Shield, with an average underpayment of $35 per patient. He suggests that an average of three weekly state patient contacts per practitioner could amount to a $105 weekly loss per practitioner. So although sticking points remain regarding the communications from United, "in terms of the many issues, the biggest is reimbursement," states Pressman.

Nevertheless, while Oppenheimer says that he has gotten answers to some of the questions he asks on behalf of RIPA membership, it's been "chasing information from them instead of them broadcasting policies. It shouldn't be up to the association to be the communicator of their procedures." Questions remain, he says, about numbers of sessions permitted and where to send claim forms, because United has many locations.

Peter Erickson, Ph.D., president of RIPA, adds that although it is his understanding that no preauthorization is required for patients covered by the state contract (this has been confirmed by United officials), preauthorization is required for other United clients. He says that he has not received an official communication from United stating this important fact. Yet, United says that it did send a letter to its providers that includes this information.

Additionally, although the contract states that for the first six months out-of-network psychologists seeing patients may bill United for their full fee minus the patient's copay, and that after six months patients choosing to see out-of-network providers may submit claims to United and receive an out-of-network provider reimbursement payment, this information has not been communicated to R.I.'s psychologists.

Debora Spano, United's regional public relations director, responds that recruitment letters went out to all providers in R.I. on March 21. The letter explains that United is the new managed behavioral health vendor and states that no pre-authorization is required for these patients, but it fails to mention the arrangements for out-of-network psychologists during the first six months or thereafter.

Some psychologists also claim that they or their patients have encountered poorly trained United staff when calling help lines. James Curran, Ph.D., RIPA's federal advocate, says that he is an existing United provider and has not received information from United about filing claims for these patients. Curran is treating some patients under this contract who had formerly been seen by non-United providers. The patients have told him that when they called United with billing questions, they were informed there was no mental health coverage. "Clearly they [United] are very confused," says Curran. Counters United Behavioral Health's Director of Communications and Public Relations, Ann Fleischauer: "We believe that the contract installation has been going well." Subscribers, she says, have received new identification cards, providers have been notified of the increased rates, new providers are being recruited and United providers can "reach us through different avenues." Anyone new to the network receives claim-filing information, she says.