New England Psychologist - nepsy.com Banner Ad
An Independent Voice for the State's Psychologist
Psy Jobs CE Listings Archives Contact
HomeColumnsBook ReviewsHospital DirectoryAdvertisingClassifiedsAbout Us

What House Bill 3532 says
(November 2004 Issue)

Rep. Ruth B. Balser, Ph.D., (D-Newton), in concert with the Massachusetts Psychological Association, filed legislation to remove restrictive covenant clauses from contracts for Bay State psychologists. Sen. Cynthia Stone Creem (D-Newton) provided additional legislative support for the bill. Approved on July 26, 2004, Gov. Mitt Romney signed House Bill 3532 on August 2, "An Act Clarifying Restrictive Covenants," into law. Now known as Chapter 209 of the Acts of 2004, the law addresses restrictive covenants as they apply to psychologists.

Inserted as Section 129B of Chapter 112 of the General Laws, the language reads: "A contract or agreement which creates or establishes the terms of a partnership, employment, or any other form of professional relationship with a psychologist licensed under this chapter, which includes a restriction of the right of the psychologist to practice in any geographic area for any period of time after termination of the partnership, employment or professional relationship shall be void and unenforceable with respect to the restriction; but, nothing herein shall render void or unenforceable the remainder of the contract or agreement."

Similar to a non-compete business agreement, the former wording barred a provider from treating clients in a particular geographic area for a specified length of time after leaving a managed care organization (MCO) or healthcare facility. Additionally, a provider might be prevented from treating clients previously associated with the MCO or hospital. This law became effective on Oct. 24, 2004.

Similar protection already exists for physicians and nurses.

Phyllis Hanlon